![]() |
|
|||||||||||||||||||||||||
|
In this Section:
|
Water Law & PolicyOverview | Research Methods | Results Any
assessment of climate impacts on water resources must take into account
the legal and institutional structure within which decision making is
framed. This project summarized significant climate implications embedded
in key international, federal, state, and local laws and policies. Federal, state, tribal, and local water regulations were considered, as well as international agreements between the U.S. and Mexico. The major issues and implications of the findings for the state of Arizona, particularly the Tucson and Phoenix AMAs, were identified and discussed. This component of the project has been completed. We concluded that Arizona has a reasonably well-developed institutional structure for governing water management in the more stringently managed areas of the state, such as the Active Management Areas (AMAs). This structure provides a basis for balancing climatic and ecological factors with human stresses, especially rapid population growth, on the states environmental and natural resource base. However, the institutional foundation of the state is based on a relatively narrow conceptualization of climate variability, and thus is a source of potentially serious constraint to effective water management in times of climatic stress. Some of the existing institutions and policies, especially those addressing water rights, water storage and recovery, interstate and intrastate water marketing, water transfer, and consumer pricing, need to be broadened in scope and authority to manage water resources effectively under conditions of severe stress. The results of this study are included in CLIMAS Report #CL2-01: An Examination of Arizona Water Law and Policy from the Perspective of Climate Impacts. |
|||||||||||||||||||||||||