| |
Bring
together key decision makers, information providers, researchers,
and managers concerned about climate implications for management
of forest fire hazards and prescribed burning. |
| |
|
| |
Evaluate
the 2000 fire season in the context of information presented at
our February 2000 workshop, including an assessment of the utility
of the February 2000 workshop for improving fire management. What
went wrong? What went well? |
| |
|
| |
Examine
climate-fire interactions: El Niño, La Niña and ENSO-neutral,
present the 2001 climate forecasts, discuss issues regarding interpretation
of long-range climate forecasts and forecast uncertainty.
|
| |
|
| |
Identify
specific climate information needs, including: How
can climate information be incorporated into management plans? How
should a National Climate Service be designed in order to fit the
needs of fire managers and decision makers? |
| |
|
| |
Move
forward on the action plan developed during the February, 2000 workshop
and identify resources to accomplish action items. |
| |
|
| |
Establish
a process for sustaining interactions between fire managers, researchers,
and climate forecasters to assure timely and appropriate provision
of climate information: What format would best facilitate communication
between fire managers and climatologists? |
| |
|
| |
Get
input on and organize a coherent integrated assessment approach
to researching climate impacts on wildfire regimes and related forest
and wildland management. |